Re: Update some comments for fasthash - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Naylor
Subject Re: Update some comments for fasthash
Date
Msg-id CANWCAZbxhniuH_11=nq0AV3iBfN8CPtxYN4Tkb+N8O367H0P0w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re:Update some comments for fasthash  ("zengman" <zengman@halodbtech.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 5:09 PM zengman <zengman@halodbtech.com> wrote:
> I noticed that "hashcode code" in the patch seems a bit redundant — it might be worth adjusting this part.
> ```
> - * interface. Returns the same 64-bit hashcode code as the original,
> + * interface. Returns the same 64-bit hashcode as the original,
> ```

Pushed, with that correction, thanks for looking!

--
John Naylor
Amazon Web Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: RE: Assert the timestamp is available for ORIGN_DIFFERS conflicts
Next
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: Skipping schema changes in publication