Re: Change GUC hashtable to use simplehash? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Naylor
Subject Re: Change GUC hashtable to use simplehash?
Date
Msg-id CANWCAZbxVto_L6ynXd4rPNyDbXoJxCTJJQV6zkfFriHEcP-Vxw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Change GUC hashtable to use simplehash?  ("Anton A. Melnikov" <a.melnikov@postgrespro.ru>)
Responses Re: Change GUC hashtable to use simplehash?
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 9:58 AM Anton A. Melnikov
<a.melnikov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> > Hi, my understanding was you previously tested with the revert. Did
> > you not actually test, or are you building differently for these
> > cases?
>
> My first test [1] was made at b7493e1
> while the second [2] at ecb8226a after reverting in the 235328ee.

Three weeks ago, you said "Agreed that reverting seems as a preferable
way, and here's why." I assumed that meant you tested it, so my
mistake. I'll take a look.

--
John Naylor
Amazon Web Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: vignesh C
Date:
Subject: Re: Restrict publishing of partitioned table with a foreign table as partition
Next
From: Bertrand Drouvot
Date:
Subject: Re: Track the amount of time waiting due to cost_delay