Re: User functions for building SCRAM secrets - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Naylor
Subject Re: User functions for building SCRAM secrets
Date
Msg-id CANWCAZbvCOxtnr5YQutn=Q+KY=2E3QZsieYqP-uLTqh_h-xgxg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: User functions for building SCRAM secrets  ("Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: User functions for building SCRAM secrets
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 9:06 PM Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org> wrote:
>
> Maybe I'm not conveying the problem this is solving -- I'm happy to go
> one more round trying to make it clearer -- but if this is not clear,
> it'd be good to at develop an alternative approach to this before
> withdrawing the patch.

This thread had some lively discussion, but it doesn't seem to have
converged towards consensus, and hasn't had activity since April. That
being the case, maybe it's time to withdraw and reconsider the
approach later?



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Lakhin
Date:
Subject: Re: Improving asan/ubsan support
Next
From: John Naylor
Date:
Subject: Commitfest 2023-11 is almost over