Re: Proposal for enabling auto-vectorization for checksum calculations - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Naylor
Subject Re: Proposal for enabling auto-vectorization for checksum calculations
Date
Msg-id CANWCAZbjdFnBiUmrBQC5vFFy0Fnn4SJG4AkkzGpTFhovodJdYQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal for enabling auto-vectorization for checksum calculations  (Andrew Kim <tenistarkim@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 8:58 AM Andrew Kim <tenistarkim@gmail.com> wrote:
> The removal of the backend-side checksum_backend_lib stanza without an
> equivalent dependency path explains the CI breakage clearly,
> and your diagnosis makes sense, v10-0003 approach,
> splitting the body of checksum_block into a semi-private
> implementation header while preserving the externally visible
> interface,
> that makes sense to me

Glad to hear it.

> I’m supportive of using v10 as the basis for further discussion and iteration,
> cleaning up Meson dependency declarations so generated headers are
> properly ordered,
> refining the PG_CHECKSUM_INTERNAL usage if needed,

Great!

It sounds like you've found some issues to address? It's not clear.

--
John Naylor
Amazon Web Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: typedef indentation in pg_shmem.h
Next
From: Steven Niu
Date:
Subject: Re: str_casefold: fix typo in error message