Re: centralize CPU feature detection - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Naylor
Subject Re: centralize CPU feature detection
Date
Msg-id CANWCAZbKQ2im1r4ztcyfqNh_6gaJzyewabExYrkACNvMNyqxog@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: centralize CPU feature detection  (Zsolt Parragi <zsolt.parragi@percona.com>)
Responses Re: centralize CPU feature detection
Re: centralize CPU feature detection
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 20, 2026 at 3:26 PM Zsolt Parragi <zsolt.parragi@percona.com> wrote:
>
> 1-3 looks good to me, other than the need for the proper commit messages.

I've committed 0001.

> There's a typo in " Are ZMM registeres enabled?" in 3.

Fixed. 0002 and 0003 are attached with draft commit messages. There
was also a cosmetic mistake in an enum member name, whose correction
was squashed in the wrong direction -- this has been fixed. I also
added the new typedef for pgindent and restored a lost comment for
pg_comp_crc32c_choose(). This seems committable, but will double-check
everything works correctly.

--
John Naylor
Amazon Web Services

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: refactor architecture-specific popcount code
Next
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL Property Graph Queries (SQL/PGQ)