Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Naylor
Subject Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Date
Msg-id CANWCAZb43ZNRK03bzftnVRAfHzNGzH26sjc0Ep-sj8+w20VzSg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 11:12 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I'd like to push 0001 and 0002 shortly, and then do another sweep over
> > 0003, with remaining feedback, and get that in so we get some
> > buildfarm testing before the remaining polishing work on
> > tidstore/vacuum.
>
> Sounds a reasonable plan. 0001 and 0002 look good to me. I'm going to
> polish tidstore and vacuum patches and update commit messages.

I don't think v66 got a CI run because of vacuumlazy.c bitrot, so I'm
attaching v67 which fixes that and has some small cosmetic adjustments
to the template. One functional change for debugging build is that
RT_STATS now prints out the number of leaves. I'll squash and push
0001 tomorrow morning unless there are further comments.

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix race condition in InvalidatePossiblyObsoleteSlot()