Re: tuple radix sort - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Naylor
Subject Re: tuple radix sort
Date
Msg-id CANWCAZaaGcp6OQyK9WuB3V9Lp5xctNB3WNWiqo+TopUKvJDbLQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: tuple radix sort  ("cca5507" <cca5507@qq.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 8, 2026 at 3:20 PM cca5507 <cca5507@qq.com> wrote:
>
> > I also thought we should change this cast:
> >
> >         if (ssup->comparator == ssup_datum_signed_cmp)
> >         {
> > -               norm_datum1 = orig + ((uint64) PG_INT64_MAX) + 1;
> > +               norm_datum1 = orig + (Int64GetDatum(PG_INT64_MAX)) + 1;
> >         }
> >
> > Upthread you mention something else about treating Datum as an
> > integer, but I'm not sure if this is what you meant since you didn't
> > say. If you have concrete suggestions, feel free to share them.
>
> I think we can keep it as is now.

It's harmless, but see commit ff89e182d.

I included the assert along with the above and some small cosmetic
fixes I've been saving.

--
John Naylor
Amazon Web Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "cca5507"
Date:
Subject: Re: Why is_admin_of_role() use ROLERECURSE_MEMBERS rather than ROLERECURSE_PRIVS?
Next
From: JoongHyuk Shin
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't call ereport(ERROR) from recovery target GUC assign hooks