Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: maintenance_work_mem = 64kB doesn't work for vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Naylor
Subject Re: maintenance_work_mem = 64kB doesn't work for vacuum
Date
Msg-id CANWCAZaR_evWtizo63=bkuAaMPH+P=FMCaaqz0PC3rG6mzxw1Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to maintenance_work_mem = 64kB doesn't work for vacuum  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: maintenance_work_mem = 64kB doesn't work for vacuum
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 1:46 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Commit bbf668d66fbf6 (back-patched to v17) lowered the minimum
> maintenance_work_mem to 64kB, but it doesn't work for parallel vacuum

That was done in the first place to make a regression test for a bug
fix easier, but that test never got committed. In any case I found it
worked back in July:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CANWCAZZb7wd403wHQQUJZjkF%2BRWKAAa%2BWARP0Rj0EyMcfcdN9Q%40mail.gmail.com

--
John Naylor
Amazon Web Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Query ID Calculation Fix for DISTINCT / ORDER BY and LIMIT / OFFSET
Next
From: Melanie Plageman
Date:
Subject: Re: maintenance_work_mem = 64kB doesn't work for vacuum