Request a Demo
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Reduce timing overhead of EXPLAIN ANALYZE using rdtsc? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Naylor
Subject Re: Reduce timing overhead of EXPLAIN ANALYZE using rdtsc?
Date
Msg-id CANWCAZaPDVfO-f_Ejk_fJmSWU64ob8bK5uo9bUz_9pAuzgSVRg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Reduce timing overhead of EXPLAIN ANALYZE using rdtsc?  (Lukas Fittl <lukas@fittl.com>)
Responses Re: Reduce timing overhead of EXPLAIN ANALYZE using rdtsc?
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 9:29 PM Lukas Fittl <lukas@fittl.com> wrote:
>
> Hi John,
>
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 3:59 AM John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Looks good. The only thing that I would change is the single-letter
> > parameter/variable name "r". We could call it "reg" and it'd still be
> > pretty short. If you agree or have another suggestion, I can change
> > locally before pushing 0001 -- no need for a new patch set yet.
>
> Sure, I mainly felt that "exx" would be odd to keep, but "reg" sounds good.

Okay, pushed that way. I also took the liberty of moving a couple
comment changes in 0005 to here. My hope is that will reduce merge
conflicts with the AVX checksums patch, since that one also
invalidates one of those comments and it's not clear which will be
committed first.

--
John Naylor
Amazon Web Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Lukas Fittl
Date:
Subject: Re: Stack-based tracking of per-node WAL/buffer usage
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Reduce log level of some logical decoding messages to DEBUG1