Re: GB18030-2022 Support in PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Naylor
Subject Re: GB18030-2022 Support in PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id CANWCAZaNRXZ-5NuXmsaMA2mKvMZnCGHZqQusLkpE+8YX+i5OYg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: GB18030-2022 Support in PostgreSQL  (Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: GB18030-2022 Support in PostgreSQL
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 2:59 PM John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com> wrote:
> The only change I made for v9 is to reword the regression test
> addition from "upgrades" to "change". I'm planning to commit next week
> unless there are objections. (If anyone otherwise busy with the PG18
> release wants a chance to weigh in, let me know and I'll hold off).

Pushed.

On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 4:45 PM Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com> wrote:
> So, no immediate action to take, right? I may work out such a query before starting of release note work.

Sounds good. Were you also interested in seeing if EUC_CN can use the
same UCM file? That would allow us to get rid of the XML file.

--
John Naylor
Amazon Web Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bertrand Drouvot
Date:
Subject: Re: Report bytes and transactions actually sent downtream
Next
From: Ashutosh Sharma
Date:
Subject: Re: issue with synchronized_standby_slots