Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Naylor
Subject Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Date
Msg-id CANWCAZaKjbHbPdoho7Q0F_GQ7JidOHRUnO6OzvBm=HwmAK=uQQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum  (John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 7:26 PM John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I pushed both of these and see that mylodon complains that anonymous
> unions are a C11 feature. I'm not actually sure that the union with
> uintptr_t is actually needed, though, since that's not accessed as
> such here. The simplest thing seems to get rid if the union and name
> the inner struct "header", as in the attached.

I pushed this with some comment adjustments.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: jian he
Date:
Subject: Re: Catalog domain not-null constraints
Next
From: Matthias van de Meent
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 17 Release Management Team & Feature Freeze