Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Naylor
Subject Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Date
Msg-id CANWCAZZ5Jrbi3R6+9JaN0G8Rwww+oGEV_UDsPxA__xEVs7rwdQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 8:02 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 1:53 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >
> > I'm not sure why it took a couple weeks for Coverity to notice
> > ee1b30f12, but it saw it today, and it's not happy:
>
> Hmm, I've also done Coverity Scan in development but I wasn't able to
> see this one for some reason...

Hmm, before 30e144287 this code only ran in a test module, is it
possible Coverity would not find it there?



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Next
From: Japin Li
Date:
Subject: Re: Cannot find a working 64-bit integer type on Illumos