Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Naylor
Subject Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Date
Msg-id CANWCAZYmfEwWd508YwoKPJp=1mfMFKXpQpFAuOikOEdRCrcTfg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 11:15 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It looks like it requires a link with pgport_srv but I'm not sure. It
> seems that the recent commit 1f1d73a8b breaks CI, Windows - Server
> 2019, VS 2019 - Meson & ninja, too.

Unfortunately, none of the Windows animals happened to run both after
the initial commit and before removing the (seemingly useless on our
daily platfoms) link. I'll confirm on my own CI branch in a few
minutes.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: Built-in CTYPE provider
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum