Re: refactor architecture-specific popcount code - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Naylor
Subject Re: refactor architecture-specific popcount code
Date
Msg-id CANWCAZY-0zLfpf_J9Yy1fPOrQ6t7iQ_hr+Ca2Bc5AEDajfBqww@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: refactor architecture-specific popcount code  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: refactor architecture-specific popcount code
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Feb 22, 2026 at 4:23 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2026 at 08:49:32AM +0700, John Naylor wrote:
> > In short, I'm in favor of v14, along with the comment about newer
> > compilers from v15.
>
> WFM.  Here's what I have staged for commit.

+1 -- my only nitpick is "Since pg_popcount() uses a function
pointer..." is really "may use".

--
John Naylor
Amazon Web Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: Row pattern recognition
Next
From: Boris Mironov
Date:
Subject: Re: Idea to enhance pgbench by more modes to generate data (multi-TXNs, UNNEST, COPY BINARY)