Re: vacuum and table locking - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Payal Singh
Subject Re: vacuum and table locking
Date
Msg-id CANUg7LAsPGDJF4bmgF7E5S2MH0eHzpBbpL6u-DgWPk-xN5e1bg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to vacuum and table locking  (John Scalia <jayknowsunix@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-admin
this may only take a couple of milliseconds as I think this builds a temporary table from the one
being vacuumed and then when complete, drops the old table and renames the temporary.

I think pg_repack does that, and hence can remove bloat without locking the whole table. https://github.com/reorg/pg_repack 

Payal Singh,
Database Administrator,
OmniTI Computer Consulting Inc.
Phone: 240.646.0770 x 253

On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 11:59 AM, John Scalia <jayknowsunix@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,

I have a question regarding vacuum and locking, but since I currently don't have access to my servers (maintenance activities), I can't verify on my own. I know that VACUUM has at
least four variants. OK, actually two with ability to add ANALYZE after the operation. Here we go:

VACUUM (VACUUM ANALYZE) - shouldn't need to lock the table(?). I'm looking at the Douglas' book "PostgreSQL" on page 804 where it claims the operation does not require exclusive
access.

VACUUM FULL (VACUUM FULL ANALYZE) - will need to lock the table, but I'm thinking this may only take a couple of milliseconds as I think this builds a temporary table from the one
being vacuumed and then when complete, drops the old table and renames the temporary. So the lock should only be during this move, or does it lock the table for the entirety?

Is this correct? And how does it then resolve say another deletion in the table that occurs while the VACUUM is in operation? I hope that is clearly expressed.
--
Jay



--
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: John Scalia
Date:
Subject: vacuum and table locking
Next
From: Steve Crawford
Date:
Subject: Re: vacuum and table locking