Re: Inaccurate results from numeric ln(), log(), exp() and pow() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Inaccurate results from numeric ln(), log(), exp() and pow()
Date
Msg-id CANP8+jLwiGw+1ueGiBR0=pjiGkHcN_ktqRPB9QCk4PuPUAkf7Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Inaccurate results from numeric ln(), log(), exp() and pow()  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Inaccurate results from numeric ln(), log(), exp() and pow()  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 10 December 2015 at 18:59, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
   Why did we make the change?  I'm not sure it's bad, but
it seems funny to whack a user-visible behavior around like this
without a clearly-explained reason.

Surely the title of the post explains?

--
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch: ResourceOwner optimization for tables with many partitions
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Error with index on unlogged table