On 22 February 2018 at 18:24, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Are there any other caveats in doing that this actually makes it dangerous
>> to just allow bypassing it for extensions?
>
> Don't think so; we autovacuum such DBs anyway don't we?
Yeh, there is already precedent that should mean it is easy/default
for background workers to ignore datallowcon.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
