Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.
Date
Msg-id CANP8+jLSvPpyT+bWQAwpTcBPYVgEF2tAA8-aArw8G1rhM8QvVA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 8 September 2016 at 10:26, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:

> "k (n1, n2, n3)" == "first k (n1, n2, n3)" doesn't break backward
> compatibility but most users would think "k(n1, n2, n3)" as quorum
> after introduced quorum.
> I wish we can change the s_s_names syntax of 9.6 to "first k(n1, n2,
> n3)" style before 9.6 releasing if we got consensus.

Let's see the proposed patch, so we can evaluate the proposal.

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning - another take
Next
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: ICU integration