Re: [HACKERS] Documentation improvements for partitioning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Documentation improvements for partitioning
Date
Msg-id CANP8+jLH5poBiZ5FW2MQ_9Coz17kXxhL4BWxuF=zMstgP1y_1g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Documentation improvements for partitioning  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Documentation improvements for partitioning  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 22 February 2017 at 19:57, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:

> FWIW, I agree that some of what has been claimed about what
> contributors failed to do with this patch is exaggerated, and not in a
> way that I'd understand as hyperbole that drives home a deeper point.

What claims are you talking about? Which things have been exaggerated,
and by whom?

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Automatic cleanup of oldest WAL segments with pg_receivexlog