Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: computing completion tag is expensive for pgbench -S -M prepared - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: computing completion tag is expensive for pgbench -S -M prepared
Date
Msg-id CANP8+jL1O--E7B25j_Loy+bjJhAFpZAc4Trp1ZouadW8w5ngqQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: computing completion tag is expensive for pgbench -S -M prepared  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: computing completion tag is expensive for pgbench -S -M prepared
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 7 June 2018 at 11:29, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:

>> Do we actually need the completion tag at all? In most cases??
>
>
> affected rows is taken from this value on protocol level

I didn't mean we should remove the number of rows. Many things rely on that.

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: computing completion tag is expensive for pgbench -S -M prepared
Next
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: Expression errors with "FOR UPDATE" and postgres_fdw withpartition wise join enabled.