Re: Indexes on partitioned tables and foreign partitions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Indexes on partitioned tables and foreign partitions
Date
Msg-id CANP8+jKLgw0oGPph7iaVQT4W+MUtu13e7_Rz7_4A05+EkOq4qg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Indexes on partitioned tables and foreign partitions  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Indexes on partitioned tables and foreign partitions  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 9 May 2018 at 16:15, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 11:14 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> On 9 May 2018 at 16:10, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>>>> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 9:08 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>>>> Shouldn't the fix be to allow creation of indexes on foreign tables?
>>>>> (Maybe they would be virtual or foreign indexes??)
>>>
>>>> It might be useful to invent the concept of a foreign index, but not
>>>> for v11 a month after feature freeze.
>>>
>>> Yeah.  That's a can of worms we can *not* open at this stage.
>>
>> Lucky nobody suggested that then, eh? Robert's just making a joke.
>
> Someone did suggest that.  It was you.

Oh, you weren't joking. I think we're having serious problems with
people putting words in my mouth again then.

Please show me where I suggested doing anything for v11?

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Cutting initdb's runtime (Perl question embedded)
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Indexes on partitioned tables and foreign partitions