Re: pgsql: Separate block sampling functions - Mailing list pgsql-committers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: pgsql: Separate block sampling functions
Date
Msg-id CANP8+jKJFimw3frmX2ewfyNC0SHssKaKgpOTt5_c5dmOCxQmeQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql: Separate block sampling functions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pgsql: Separate block sampling functions  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-committers
On 15 May 2015 at 04:59, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
 
The difference there was that that was specifically adding a new feature
of value to FDWs.  This is just drive-by breakage.

I think that comment is reasonable. I will continue with my commits of tablesample, then return to see if we can improve/revert the API breakage. 

--
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

pgsql-committers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add pg_audit, an auditing extension
Next
From: Thom Brown
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add pg_audit, an auditing extension