Re: Extension support for postgres_fdw - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Extension support for postgres_fdw
Date
Msg-id CANP8+jKAREemyYU9qC+HinrTuSdGU1e-D_dgCxCBNwO+j9HKqQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Extension support for postgres_fdw  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Extension support for postgres_fdw  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 20 June 2015 at 18:19, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
 
The key question here is whether filtering functions/operators at the
level of extensions is a good design.  It seems to me like a reasonable
compromise between flexibility and ease of use, but others might see it
differently. 

I like that, but currently we handle things in terms of Schemas. It would be strange to have differing ways of specifying groups of objects. Maybe that's not a problem, but we'd probably need to analyse that to make sure it didn't make things more complex.

--
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Auto-vacuum is not running in 9.1.12
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Extension support for postgres_fdw