Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Date
Msg-id CANP8+jJzr_AooGxt0WUAv7q1D8p69xCKa0f1_Ksao5R9XPZTyg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view
On 5 April 2016 at 12:26, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
 
Multiple standbys with the same name may connect to the master.
In this case, users might want to specifiy k<=N. So k<=N seems not invalid
setting.

Confusing as that is, it is already the case; k > N could make sense. ;-(

However, in most cases, k > N would not make sense and we should issue a WARNING. 

--
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: GIN data corruption bug(s) in 9.6devel
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Updated backup APIs for non-exclusive backups