Re: a raft of parallelism-related bug fixes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: a raft of parallelism-related bug fixes
Date
Msg-id CANP8+jJwSmQ_xfnPhTdPrWVQikCAGpM8=oYnVbDjiwvzsnVCvw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to a raft of parallelism-related bug fixes  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: a raft of parallelism-related bug fixes  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 12 October 2015 at 18:04, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
 
My recent commit of the Gather executor node has made it relatively
simple to write code that does an end-to-end test of all of the
parallelism-relate commits which have thus far gone into the tree.

I've been wanting to help here for a while, but time remains limited for next month or so.

From reading this my understanding is that there isn't a test suite included with this commit?

I've tried to review the Gather node commit and I note that the commit message contains a longer description of the functionality in that patch than any comments in the patch as a whole. No design comments, no README, no file header comments. For such a major feature that isn't acceptable - I would reject a patch from others on that basis alone (and have done so). We must keep the level of comments high if we are to encourage wider participation in the project.

So reviewing patch 13 isn't possible without prior knowledge.

Hoping we'll be able to find some time on this at PGConf.eu; thanks for coming over.

--
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Allow ssl_renegotiation_limit in PG 9.5
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Allow ssl_renegotiation_limit in PG 9.5