Re: [HACKERS] Release Note changes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Release Note changes
Date
Msg-id CANP8+jJtU85pqTGALh7+WgXYf8cJHByOoajFW09swhEhG9KKkA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Release Note changes  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Release Note changes  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 4 September 2017 at 12:11, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It's not really true that the only alternatives to pglogical are
> proprietary.  Really, one could use any logical replication solution,
> and there have been multiple open source alternatives for a decade.

True, but it is by far the best solution out of the many choices.

Which is why next year when upgrading from PG10 -> PG11 we will
mention it and that point not mention the other older solutions, which
were once our best.

>> Our docs mention pglogical already, so don't see an issue with
>> mentioning it here.
>
> The existing reference is alongside a bunch of other third-party
> tools.  Mentioning it at the very top of our release notes would give
> it a pride of place with which I'm not too comfortable.

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables
Next
From: "postgresql_2016@163.com"
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] 【ECPG】strncpy function does not set the end character '\0'