Re: [HACKERS] SCRAM salt length - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: [HACKERS] SCRAM salt length
Date
Msg-id CANP8+jJsW89ktG9R9SfdU09oLrFQpuKZeJGWtmnpqvNoJmbfdg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] SCRAM salt length  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 16 August 2017 at 14:10, Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> The SCRAM salt length is currently set as
>
> /* length of salt when generating new verifiers */
> #define SCRAM_DEFAULT_SALT_LEN     12
>
> without further comment.
>
> I suspect that this length was chosen based on the example in RFC 5802
> (SCRAM-SHA-1) section 5.  But the analogous example in RFC 7677
> (SCRAM-SHA-256) section 3 uses a length of 16.  Should we use that instead?

16 preferred, IMHO

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] expanding inheritance in partition bound order
Next
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pl/perl extension fails on Windows