Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11
Date
Msg-id CANP8+jJdrm_Fugei+32DKpp=2GV4RcFmfDk+rm2F1dAmQQWm7A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 26 March 2018 at 23:10, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>> As far as I
>>> know, the proposed MERGE patch has that issue an existing DML commands
>>> don't; but someone else may have better information.
>>
>> I will look deeper and report back.
>
> It's quite clear that the problem exists with the MERGE patch

Accepted, the only question is whether it affects UPDATE as well cos
it looks like it should.

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Teodor Sigaev
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017 : Patch for predicate locking in Gist index
Next
From: Andrey Borodin
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017 : Patch for predicate locking in Gist index