Re: [HACKERS] Minor improvement for inval.c header comment - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Minor improvement for inval.c header comment
Date
Msg-id CANP8+jJLx9-g9aomVHOaTk8mpUssJiLRyGNrf6NZaKLmqmz+uw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] Minor improvement for inval.c header comment  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Minor improvement for inval.c header comment  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 13 April 2017 at 09:27, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> Attached patch modifies a sentence in the inval.c header comment to
> mention that operations on a pg_index tuple also registers relcache flush
> operation.

Correctly observed. Patch pushed.

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] Minor improvement for inval.c header comment
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Minor improvement for inval.c header comment