Re: [HACKERS] Failed recovery with new faster 2PC code - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Failed recovery with new faster 2PC code
Date
Msg-id CANP8+j+yUu=58fygS9_aJOXAgUzau5zaQo8HiWdX2z3b9uN6Dw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Failed recovery with new faster 2PC code  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Failed recovery with new faster 2PC code  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 18 April 2017 at 13:12, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 7:54 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> Yeh, this is better. Pushed.
>
> I have been outraced on this one, the error is obvious once you see it ;)

Didn't realise you were working on it, nothing competitive about it.

It's clear this needed fixing, whether or not it fixes Jeff's report.

I do think it explains the report, so I'm hopeful.

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Continuous buildfarm failures on hamster with bin-check
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Continuous buildfarm failures on hamster with bin-check