Re: a raft of parallelism-related bug fixes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: a raft of parallelism-related bug fixes
Date
Msg-id CANP8+j+uJ1-axTYd2MW47b-VQKNtcgUSKn0zJ4tcRDLPSD=UPg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: a raft of parallelism-related bug fixes  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: a raft of parallelism-related bug fixes  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 17 October 2015 at 18:17, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
 
It's good to have your perspective on how this can be improved, and
I'm definitely willing to write more documentation.  Any lack in that
area is probably due to being too close to the subject area, having
spent several years on parallelism in general, and 200+ emails on
parallel sequential scan in particular.  Your point about the lack of
a good header file comment for execParallel.c is a good one, and I'll
rectify that next week.

Not on your case in a big way, just noting the need for change there.

I'll help as well, but if you could start with enough basics to allow me to ask questions that will help. Thanks. 

--
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Lukas Fittl
Date:
Subject: Re: SuperUser check in pg_stat_statements
Next
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: Less than ideal error reporting in pg_stat_statements