Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> So I propose the attached patch. Any objections? Should this get >> back-patched? It's arguably a bug, though surely a minor one, that >> the message comes out when it does.
> I would vote against a back-patch. And I kind of agree with Jim's > comments that we ought to consider sprinkling a few more debug > messages into the shutdown sequence.
[ shrug... ] I won't stand in the way of someone else figuring out what makes sense there, but I don't intend to do it; and I don't think that the quick hacks I did over the last couple days make a reasonable basis for a permanent patch.
I think its worth adding log messages, but only when its slower than expected.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services