On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz> wrote:
> On 9 Srpen 2011, 9:18, Vivekkumar Pandey wrote:
>> I have seen that autovacuum takes long time to process .
>> please give me the reason ......
>
> What do you mean by "takes long time to process"? How do you measure it?
>
> Autovacuum is meant as a background process, and it should run on
> background and not influence the performance significantly. In some cases
> the default settings is not aggressive enough, so the database grows.
>
> In that case you probably need to
> - lower autovacuum_vacuum_threshold
> - lower autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor
> - lower autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay
> - increase autovacuum_vacuum_cost_limit
>
> But I'm not sure this is the case. And this does not release the space,
> it's still occupied by the database (just ready to be reused by new data).
>
> If you really want to compact the database, you may run VACUUM FULL. But
> that may be very intensive process, locks tables etc.
>
> Tomas
>
>
I have seen postgres.log file and search for a string "autovacuum" .
I found that
time | DB
--------------------------
5:04 | template0
5:09 | DB1
5:25 | DB2
5:30 | template1
5:35 | template0
5:40 | DB1
5:54 | DB2
5:59 | template1
this time is given when autovacuum process available for Database.
Here we see that DB1 consume around 15 min of autovacuum process
while others consume 5 min(equal to naptime).
this shows autovacuum process takes too much time for DB1.
Also, size of DB1 is 15 GB .
Is there any relation of b/w big size of DB and long autovacuum process time????
--
Thanks
VIVEK KUMAR PANDEY
