Re: CI slowdown due to PG_TEST_INITDB_EXTRA_OPTS - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Subject Re: CI slowdown due to PG_TEST_INITDB_EXTRA_OPTS
Date
Msg-id CAN55FZ3jqqX9Th23XmDv6U-xwJjzsuc1JffYmswFT=oqy8JfrQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: CI slowdown due to PG_TEST_INITDB_EXTRA_OPTS  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On Tue, 21 Jul 2026 at 03:56, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2026-07-20 23:47:16 +0200, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
> > On Sat, 18 Jul 2026 at 20:48, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > > It looks like any one job mostly uses the same value of
> > > PG_TEST_INITDB_EXTRA_OPTS.  Could we record what was used to set up
> > > the template, and allow using it if that matches?
>
> I wonder if the best thing would be to add PG_TEST_SERVER_POSTGRES_OPTS or
> such, which Cluster.pm and regress.c would add to postgresql.conf.

Attached is an attempt to implement 'PG_TEST_SERVER_POSTGRES_OPTS'.

Like Jelte, I didn't see any improvement for MacOS.

-- 
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: shveta malik
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Preserve replication origin OIDs in pg_upgrade
Next
From: Tender Wang
Date:
Subject: Re: remove_useless_joins vs. bug #19560