Hi,
On Tue, 16 Dec 2025 at 23:53, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>
>
> On 2025-12-08 Mo 3:12 AM, Bilal Yavuz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 1 Dec 2025 at 06:33, Ashutosh Bapat
> <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2025 at 11:39 PM Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>
> On 2025-11-27 Th 5:19 AM, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 22 Nov 2025 at 01:16, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>
> Committed
>
> Here is a small follow-up commit for documenting this feature.
>
>
> This really belongs in the "meson" section. We need to add a new para
> there similar to the "make" section para you are trying to amend here.
>
>
> +1. I think we should follow a structure similar to the chapter
> "installation from source code" which has a separate section for meson
> at the same level as 'make and autoconf'.
>
> Done in v2.
>
> Thanks, that's better. But I'm wondering if this section shouldn't be moved to regress.sgml, alongside the equivalent
forconfigure style builds, and linked to from here in the same way.
>
> Maybe that's a topic for another day.
Thank you for looking at it!
Yes, as I wrote in v1, I had originally expected this section to live
under regress.sgml. And, I agree, that is probably a topic for another
day
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft