Hi,
On Thu, 18 Sept 2025 at 15:30, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2025-09-15 11:50:07 +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Sept 2025 at 17:55, Jacob Champion
> > <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 7:18 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote:
> > > > I don't think we need this level of complication. We already have the
> > > > situation that for example "linux" covers several tasks
> > >
> > > Recently, I've wished that it were otherwise; if I'm debugging a
> > > Meson-only test failure in Linux, I don't want to burn credits running
> > > Autoconf.
> >
> > I agree with Jacob. I think it would be better if each task had its
> > own tag. I left it as "vs2019" for now.
>
> I don't really agree that this is something that needs to be changed as part
> of this.
Definitely.
> Or that the CI_OS_ONLY is really the way to tackle this.
>
> Perhaps we should just have CI_TASK_ONLY and CI_OS_ONLY?
I think this is a good idea. How about something like the attached? It
allows you to expand to the CI_*_ONLY option.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
