Re: Add pg_buffercache_mark_dirty[_all] functions to the pg_buffercache - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Subject Re: Add pg_buffercache_mark_dirty[_all] functions to the pg_buffercache
Date
Msg-id CAN55FZ1E4ruwjjarUc0WoHxSpW=CZ0aEPfSrUC4z65UtEM7DNw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Add pg_buffercache_mark_dirty[_all] functions to the pg_buffercache  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On Mon, 24 Nov 2025 at 08:46, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2025 at 01:16:57PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> > Thank you for looking into this! And sorry for the late reply.
>
> Could you rebase, please?  This has not applied for some time, but
> I've made the situation worse with 4b203d499c61.  No need to bump
> again the module for this release cycle, we can stay at 1.7 for the
> new objects.
> --
> Michael

Thanks for the heads up! It is rebased, I also added
'CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS()' while looping over the 'NBuffers' regarding
the comment in the email [1].

[1] https://postgr.es/m/D5BB1D85-0F2A-419F-A7B1-426505525D3A%40gmail.com

-- 
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Skipping schema changes in publication
Next
From: Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Date:
Subject: Re: Add pg_buffercache_mark_dirty[_all] functions to the pg_buffercache