Request a Demo
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: GetRelationPath() vs critical sections - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Subject Re: GetRelationPath() vs critical sections
Date
Msg-id CAN55FZ0LsWUC3EoFLo5c6SO-AddX99k-6Me079TZOuDL579f6w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: GetRelationPath() vs critical sections  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Hi,

On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 at 17:24, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>
> And pushed.

I realized that some comments are stale following this work.

1. _mdfd_segpath() no longer returns palloc'd string.
2. Example at the REL_PATH_STR_MAXLEN comment misses forkNames[forkNumber].

Attached patch fixes these.

-- 
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Salvatore Dipietro
Date:
Subject: Re: use a non-locking initial test in TAS_SPIN on AArch64
Next
From: Shinya Kato
Date:
Subject: Re: Add TOAST statistics columns to pg_stat_all_tables