> The issue that the 0001 patch you shared is trying to fix is the same
> one reported upthread
Ops, sorry for missing that, I only read the last few messages in the
thread properly and I didn't realize that it was a known issue. I'll
look into that discussion more.
> 2b) For Non-ALL-TABLES publications, the behavior was already correct;
> the change below is a no-op:
Yes, that part was a cosmetic change to make everything follow the
same approach, I don't think it causes any actual issues.
