On Mon, 07 Sep 2026, Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> wrote:
> However, that fix seems to have the same kind of layering
> violation that Andres complained about for the first version of the
> patch on this thread -- predicate locking should be in heapam code,
> not in execIndexing.c.
It's not just the layering violation, that solution also has a
leftover issue, similarly to my first patch in this thread. When I
looked at this my initial conclusion was that we can't fix the two at
the same place without layering violations / remaining issues, so my
idea was to apply the same fix as I did for SELECT to those paths, but
I'll take another look at it.
