> That did cross my mind, but while "enabled" feels more natural grammatically,
> "enable" corresponds to the "ENABLE" clause which is to be emitted (or omitted).
> Except when it's "DISABLE"... I can't think of any better phrasing
> which is reasonably
> short and conveys the meaning "emit the clause which indicates the trigger is to
> be disabled or enabled, and if the latter in what context".
Yeah, I agree with this reasoning, I wasn't even sure to mention this
or not. I only did because the ALTER EVENT TRIGGER documentation also
mentions "disabled", so there's some precedent of using that form.
Keeping it "enable" is fine with me.
