Re: introduce dynamic shared memory registry - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nikita Malakhov
Subject Re: introduce dynamic shared memory registry
Date
Msg-id CAN-LCVMEM54iSLFANEne7eDjGCAipmn+1dDp67Jju7q2sxfHmw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: introduce dynamic shared memory registry  (Andrei Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru>)
Responses Re: introduce dynamic shared memory registry
List pgsql-hackers
Hi!

This patch looks like a good solution for a pain in the ass, I'm too for this patch to be committed.
Have looked through the code and agree with Andrei, the code looks good.
Just a suggestion - maybe it is worth adding a function for detaching the segment,
for cases when we unload and/or re-load the extension?

--
Regards,
Nikita Malakhov
Postgres Professional
The Russian Postgres Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrei Lepikhov
Date:
Subject: Re: introduce dynamic shared memory registry
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: trying again to get incremental backup