Re: 001_password.pl fails with --without-readline - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Soumya S Murali
Subject Re: 001_password.pl fails with --without-readline
Date
Msg-id CAMtXxw-HOci9H-=1HBYxk9RaJK-5jERcwrZBORr9aA3cx8USkA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 001_password.pl fails with --without-readline  (Oleg Tselebrovskiy <o.tselebrovskiy@postgrespro.ru>)
Responses Re: 001_password.pl fails with --without-readline
List pgsql-hackers
Hi all,


On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 2:15 PM Oleg Tselebrovskiy
<o.tselebrovskiy@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
>
> > I tried applying both the v3 and v4 patches on a clean branch tree
> > reset to the current origin/master, but neither of them applied
> > cleanly due to context mismatches in BackgroundPsql.pm and
> > 030_pager.pl. I think the patches need rebasing on the current master
> > before they can be tested further. I will be happy to re-test once
> > rebased patches are available.
>
> Just applied both v3 and v4 onto 34740b9 with no conflicts. I don’t
> see any commits that touch 030_pager.pl and BackgroundPsql.pm
> last few days, so maybe you still have your code changes from
> v1 or v2, or something from debugging v3 or v4? I see that you
> specified clean code tree, but for me both v3 and v4 applied with
> no trouble
>

Thank you for the guidance.
I fetched all refs and tags locally and reset my tree to a clean
origin/master, but I am unable to locate commit 34740b9 in my
repository, so I assume it may be a local or abbreviated hash. On a
fresh branch, both v3 and v4 patches failed to apply cleanly which
suggests a base mismatch rather than an issue with the patches
themselves.
Could you please share the full commit hash or branch that these
patches are based on? I will be happy to apply them again and re-run
the full test coverage once it is available.

Regards,
Soumya



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: lakshmi
Date:
Subject: Re: parallel data loading for pgbench -i
Next
From: shveta malik
Date:
Subject: Re: Skipping schema changes in publication