On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 2:06 AM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > I think so - specifically, that it's a leftover from a revision where the > xid limit was advanced before clog truncation. > > I'll be finding time in the next couple of days to look more closely and > ensure that's all it is.
A couple of days having gone by without hearing further on this, I'm going to assume for the moment that my analysis is correct and just push a commit to remove this assertion. That's not intended to discourage you from spending further time on this - it would be bad to be wrong about this - but doing something we all agree is wrong can't be better than doing something that I, at least, think is correct.
Thanks.
Keeps getting bumped down by other things, but it's on the stack to not get lost
