Re: [HACKERS] Built-in plugin for logical decoding output - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Craig Ringer
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Built-in plugin for logical decoding output
Date
Msg-id CAMsr+YHa5j6=GMErckU2x_e5=kBK_PuX_1xLSaZth+2qbU_M3A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Built-in plugin for logical decoding output  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers


On 26 September 2017 at 01:48, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
On 09/25/2017 10:43 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2017-09-25 10:38:52 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On 09/25/2017 10:32 AM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
On 25/09/17 19:26, Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Hernandez <aht@ongres.com> writes:


There is already about 3 million output plugins out there so I think we
did reasonable job there. The fact that vast majority of that are
various json ones gives reasonable hint that we should have that one in
core though.

And I am sure that 2ndQuadrant would be happy to add it to their version of
Postgres and maintain it themselves.

https://www.2ndquadrant.com/en/resources/2ndqpostgres/

This doesn't seem like a good way to argue.


Sorry, that wasn't supposed to be negative. My point was that 2ndQuadrant has a distribution of Postgres that they support.

For what it's worth, it's mostly things that didn't make it into core for a release, things that got knocked back, backports, etc.

I for one don't want to carry a big delta from core.

--
 Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Built-in plugin for logical decoding output
Next
From: Vaishnavi Prabakaran
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Simplify ACL handling for large objects and removal ofsuperuser() checks