Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication WIP - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Craig Ringer
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication WIP
Date
Msg-id CAMsr+YHH2XRUeqWT6pn_X0tFpP5ci7Fsrsn67TDXbFLeMknhBA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication WIP  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication WIP  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers


On 21 Jan. 2017 06:48, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Petr Jelinek
<petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Launcher is needed for subscriptions, subscriptions don't depend on
> wal_level.

I don't see how a subscription can do anything useful with wal_level < logical?

The upstream must have it set to logical so we can decide the change stream.

The downstream need not. It's an independent instance. 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Possible issue with expanded object infrastructure onPostgres 9.6.1
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication WIP