Re: [HACKERS] pg_prepared_xact_status - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Craig Ringer
Subject Re: [HACKERS] pg_prepared_xact_status
Date
Msg-id CAMsr+YGQ4N7XQwsBcj4kw1jnTQ6QOTiFJ0oBPaCmYmA7pLcBCQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] pg_prepared_xact_status  (konstantin knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 30 September 2017 at 14:10, konstantin knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
 
So I do not see any troubles caused by adding this functions. And it can really be helpful for DBA in some cases.

If it's self-contained and exposes existing functionality, then I'm not opposed, I just don't really see the point. I'm not seeing where it'd come in useful.

--
 Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_prepared_xact_status
Next
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Off-by-one error in logical slot resource retention