Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Craig Ringer
Subject Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers
Date
Msg-id CAMsr+YGFvPzkh8tuaSB1SDfgHHUr1i8NE5vqOvaHLyH+ixFdAQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] delta relations in AFTER triggers  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers  (Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 1 April 2017 at 02:29, David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 12:20:51PM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > New version attached.  It needs some of these problem cases added
>> > to the testing, and a mention in the docs that only C and plpgsql
>> > triggers can use the feature so far.  I'll add those tomorrow.
>>
>> Done and attached.
>>
>> Now the question is, should it be pushed?
>
> Yes.  Among other things, that'll get it buildfarm tested and give
> people interested in other PLs better visibility.
>
> That, and I suspect that people will start using this infrastructure
> for some very cool projects.

Yeah, I was excited to see this committed. It practically begs to be
used for plpgsql TABLE valued variables backed by tuplestores.

-- Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix obsolete comment in GetSnapshotData
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: Partitioned tables and relfilenode