Re: 9.6 TAP tests and extensions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Craig Ringer
Subject Re: 9.6 TAP tests and extensions
Date
Msg-id CAMsr+YFXuKshHp1=nx+K7=U=2P8SSfqqBmvjYwqGTMmcMioT2Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 9.6 TAP tests and extensions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
<p dir="ltr"><p dir="ltr">On 24 Sep. 2016 04:04, "Tom Lane" <<a
href="mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us">tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us</a>>wrote:.<br /> ><br /> > > <br /> > > It's thus
sufficientto apply the patch to install the perl modules to<br /> > > 9.4, 9.5 and 9.6. Nothing else is needed.
I'veattached backports for<br /> > > 9.4 and 9.5.<br /> ><br /> > Pushed with cosmetic adjustments --- <p
dir="ltr">Thanks.<pdir="ltr">> Looking back over the thread, I see that you also proposed installing<br /> >
isolationtesterand pg_isolation_regress for the benefit of extensions.<br /> > I'm very much less excited about that
idea. It'd be substantially more<br /> > dead weight in typical installations, and I'm not sure that it'd be
useful<br/> > to common extensions, and I'm not eager to treat isolationtester's API<br /> > and behavior as
somethingwe need to hold stable for extension use.<p dir="ltr">Fine by me. I have no particular problem expecting those
tobe installed explicitly by ext devs who want to use them.<br /> 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: raised checkpoint limit & manual checkpoint
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Refactor StartupXLOG?