Hi Fabien, > I think that the probability of getting these useful things into pg is > alas small. In the mean time, you may package and register it as an > extension? I aimed to close the asymmetry between bit vector operations (they also offer xor/and/etc.) and bytea operations. My code is more or less a 1:1 copy of the corresponding bit vector operations (in fact, just a tiny bit easier, since bytea is byte-aligned, wheres bit vectors aren't).
I just wanted to dump the code here, given that Tom suggested (in 2006) such an implementation might be a useful addition to bytea. But I won't feel offended in any way if the code won't be merged.
Seems like a good idea to me.
Conversion between bit varying and bytea would be a big help.
So would casts from bit varying or bytea <-> integer and other types.
From:
Craig Ringer Date: Subject:
Re: let's make the list of reportable GUCs configurable (was Re: Add%r substitution for psql prompts to show recovery status)
Есть вопросы? Напишите нам!
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных
✖
By continuing to browse this website, you agree to the use of cookies. Go to Privacy Policy.